Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi (Rian Johnson, 2017)

WARNING: The very premise of this film contains spoilers for the series thus far.

Starkiller Base has been destroyed, but the First Order continues their campaign undaunted. Having disposed of the Republic, Supreme Leader Snoke has deployed his forces in order to subjugate the galaxy. The only thing standing in their way is General Leia Organa’s Resistance fighters. Although certain that her brother will rejoin the fight and light a spark of hope in the Resistance, their existence has been exposed. It is only a matter of time before Snoke’s forces overwhelms the Resistance.

Although J. J. Abrams’s The Force Awakens was a resounding success, it did draw a bit of criticism for trying to emulate A New Hope – the film that started it all. Although I feel it was partially necessary in order for the franchise to regain the goodwill it lost during the lackluster prequel trilogy, it is a valid criticism. It’s like scanning someone else’s picture. You get something that vaguely resembles the genuine article, yet lacks its essence. Worst of all, you could easily have used that piece of paper to create an original work of your own – something far more valuable than a copy of something people already like.

With The Last Jedi, director Rian Johnson made it no secret that he wanted to challenge his audience. He wasn’t going to settle for making The Last Jedi a parallel to The Empire Strikes Back; he set his sights higher. The result was a film that won the universal admiration of contemporary critics. Any of them slightly skeptical about The Force Awakens were instantly won over by The Last Jedi. Some of them even went as far as declaring it the single greatest film in the franchise. There were various reasons as to why critics adored the film, but there was a common thread among their assessments – that Mr. Johnson so thoroughly subverted everyone’s expectations, injecting the franchise with much needed originality. Was he successful? I definitely know where I stand if asked that question, but it because it wouldn’t make sense without context, it’s best to have my review provide the answer.

The film begins when General Leia orders an evacuation from Planet D’Qar. As mentioned in the opening text crawl, the Resistance members are in dire straits. Even if they destroyed Starkiller Base, they couldn’t prevent it from wiping out the Republic along with its entire neighboring planetary system in the Hosnian Cataclysm. In fact, while destroying Starkiller Base was a major triumph for the Resistance, it also means they are exposed to the brunt of the First Order’s wrath. Because they are clearly outmatched, the Resistance must escape to fight another day.

During this time, ace pilot Poe Dameron manages to shoot down various First Order spacecraft. Leia orders Poe to retreat. He ignores this order, instead feeling a better idea would be to take down a powerful enemy dreadnought. To do this, Poe acts as a messenger for General Hux as the latter is giving another one of his grand villain speeches. He then proceeds to stall Hux for a long enough time for him to charge his booster. The bombers follow his lead, and they successfully destroy the dreadnought, allowing the remaining resistance members to escape. Tragically, one pilot loses her life in the process.

I have to say that as the first significant battle scene, it is very impressively filmed. Mr. Johnson was especially proud of the research that went into the film. As the Galactic Empire, and by extension, the First Order, was primarily inspired by the Axis Powers of the Second World War, he saw fit to directly hark back to the era with this sequence. The Resistance bombers are a direct reference to real-life ones. They even expend their payloads in the exact same fashion – by opening up a bay that drops the bombs vertically.

There is little doubt that a lot of care and attention went into this scene. It also marks the exact moment the film takes a massive nosedive in quality from the previous installment. While I’m sure paying homage to the Allies who fought in the Second World War sounded great on paper, it simply cannot be ignored that the ships are not optimized for their situation. The bay doors open, somehow avoiding exposing its pilot to the vacuum of space so that the bombs drop down onto the dreadnought. However, as any kid who has ever flown a spacecraft in a video game could tell you, directions are completely meaningless in space due to a lack of gravity. Despite this, the bombs fall as though they were subject to Earth’s gravitational pull instead of floating ineffectually into the nonexistent breeze.

This implies that the dreadnought has a gravitational pull comparable to the planet Earth. It is unlikely given that, when you think about it, gravity is not a strong force – a magnet the size of your finger can easily overcome it. For that matter, it could mean the bombs themselves were magnetized, but if so, they probably would have fallen much faster. Either way, it doesn’t seem as though Mr. Johnson was thinking through his implications. It’s true that Star Wars has always taken creative liberties with outer space – most notably, in how interstellar battles are still as noisy as ever. However, this premise stretches the suspension of disbelief way too far.

It’s especially nonsensical because the original trilogy prominently featured Rebel ships known as Y-Wings. These vehicles were made exactly to address the need for bombers in a space setting. Making use of ion cannons and energy-based bombs, they could get the job done without gravity. One might argue that the Resistance, being in such a bad way, couldn’t afford Y-Wings, but this explanation is fragile. I don’t think it’s unfair to assume ships resembling World War II-era aircraft would be obsolete when people began waging wars in space. This would be like if a natural disaster hit a city in the twenty-first century, and in order for the local news reporters to write a cover story, they were forced to find and use typewriters.

The exact manner in which Poe stalls for time is highly problematic as well. While it does start off legitimately funny as a result of Poe’s audacity, it eventually devolves into what amounts to a highbrow “yo mama” joke, which by 2017, was rightly considered outdated and trite. While it seems like a comparatively minor slight compared to the existence of spacecraft with such outdated design, it is very much at odds with the film’s tone. The Resistance is in danger of being wiped out entirely, yet Mr. Johnson felt it was appropriate to have the characters joke around at inopportune moments. While one might be willing to forgive the flaws in this opening scene as artistic liberties, I can assure you that the worst has yet to come.

For having defied orders and attacking the dreadnought, Poe is slapped in the face by his superior and subsequently demoted. This begins a trend that runs throughout the entire rest of the film. While previous films would have had Poe’s superiors commend him for his quick thinking, Mr. Johnson subverts our expectations by implementing surprisingly realistic consequences. What makes this particular instance insufferable is that the dreadnought would have obliterated Leia’s Resistance cruiser in seconds had Poe followed her orders. They were in a situation in which they had no good options, and Poe’s just happened to be the least bad. Despite proving his skill time and again, he is unceremoniously demoted and placed under the command of one Vice Admiral Amilyn Holdo.

Things take a turn for the worse when the First Order catch up with the Resistance’s main vessel. Kylo Ren, the First Order’s second-in-command, hesitates to fire upon it when he realizes his mother, Leia, is onboard, but his wingmen destroy the bridge in his stead. Leia is then dragged into the depths of space and it would appear she is done for. However, she then uses the Force to fly herself back into the undamaged part of the ship.

This scene was maligned by those who didn’t like the film for being too unrealistic. While I do agree the scene doesn’t work, it’s not for that reason. NASA tests conducted in the 1960s revealed that subjects could survive and fully recover after being exposed to the vacuum of space as long they weren’t out there for more than two minutes. Leia manages to avoid this fate by flying into the ship with ten seconds to spare.

The real problem with this scene is twofold. To begin with, it looks ridiculous; detractors likened the sequence to Mary Poppins, and that is an apt comparison. The second problem – and the one more relevant to the plot – is that Leia using the Force at all is something the series had never been clear on. It stands to reason that the daughter of Darth Vader would be highly sensitive to the Force, but there was very little empirical evidence to suggest she could use it to this extent. Sure, Luke could have taught her how to use it in the interim between Return of the Jedi and The Force Awakens, but this is something that the audience needs to know. It’s not a sign of good storytelling when the audience has to fill in logic gaps for the writing staff.

With Leia unconscious, Holdo is now in command of the remaining Resistance forces. Things are looking dire for them because they realize the First Order can track them through hyperspace. Poe, having been demoted, asks the admiral if she has a plan. Rather than calmly explain Poe her plan, Holdo condescends to him. She claims she knows his type and judges their course of action is on a need-to-know basis. This is among the stupidest decisions ever made by a superior in the Star Wars canon. If she did indeed believe Poe to be hot-headed and impulsive, that would give her all the more reason to let him in on the plan. Even assuring him that a plan exists and urging him to trust her would’ve been better than what she actually does. Instead, she treats the single most talented pilot in the Resistance with no more respect than an unruly child.

Despite such a lax, scatterbrained approach to leadership, the character of Holdo was heavily praised by culture critics. In general, it’s easy to read Poe’s interactions with Holdo as an attack on male chauvinism. If that was what the writers intended, then they failed to grasp how sympathetic their characters are. It’s much easier to sympathize with Poe because he is actually trying to throw ideas out there while Holdo’s actions wind up demoralizing enough of her own crew for him to successfully stage a mutiny with their help. Meanwhile, Holdo herself comes across as the kind of person who can’t handle being in an authoritative role without resisting the impulse to throw her weight around. Exactly how a wise figure such as Leia could trust someone like that is anyone’s guess. If these were the intended reactions, then it’s a classic case of the writer succeeding far too well.

As it is, Holdo’s leadership sensibly results in her troops deserting her. Poe thinks of a plan to deactivate the First Order’s tracking device. To do this, he will need help from an expert hacker in the casino town of Canto Bight. Poe entrusts this task to ex-Stormtrooper Finn and a mechanic named Rose Tico. Even among fans of the film, this subplot is highly controversial. Merely looking at it from a storytelling standpoint, the subplot is very contrived. Finn and Rose end up getting arrested for having double parked in front of the building just when they are about to meet the hacker. This could have worked in a Star Wars parody film such as Spaceballs, but featuring it as a dramatic plot point is, once again, tonally discordant. It doesn’t help that this subplot contributes nothing to the overarching story in the end. Finn and Rose manage to find another skilled hacker – a random person named DJ who happened to be in the same exact cellblock – only for him to later betray them. This prompts Holdo to evacuate her ship and ram into Snoke’s flagship at light speed.

While the scene itself looks astonishing, it falls apart when you realized they could have just done that from the beginning. In fact, if they hadn’t recruited DJ, hundreds of Resistance members wouldn’t have died when he betrayed them. Again, Poe wouldn’t have felt the need to act out of line if Holdo let him know the full plan. What is intended to be Holdo’s greatest moment is negated by her own actions. This isn’t even getting into the question of why, exactly, nobody in the entire history of the galaxy ever thought of this tactic. If it is so demonstrably effective, why hasn’t anyone ever invented a drone-controlled ship for the express purpose of crashing into a pursuing enemy spacecraft? I would’ve assumed it to have been among the very first things strategists conceived upon inventing an engine capable of exceeding the speed of light.

However, what I find makes the subplot especially grating is its excessively preachy nature. The people in Canto Bight have profited off of the war, selling weapons to both the Resistance and the First Order. Consequently, it’s easy to read this as scathing attack on capitalism, punctuated by the rich people owning child slaves and having various wild animals in captivity. We are then meant to cheer when Finn and Rose free some of the animals, causing them to rampage through town.

To be clear, that Mr. Johnson wanted to include this message isn’t a problem in of itself. The problem is that he happened to get the preachiest during what turns out to be a meaningless subplot. Because of this, it’s impossible to escape the conclusion that he halted the main plot for the sake of forcing his audience to listen to his message. In addition to causing pacing problems, the message comes out of nowhere and stops being relevant to the story once they’ve left the planet – save for one callback in the final scene. It could be argued that this sequence was intended to show who the Resistance is fighting for, but the narrative doesn’t make a strong enough connection between the First Order and the tycoons of Canto Bight. For all we know, the latter managed spring up independent of the galaxy-spanning conflict – the only significant change being their clientele.

Exacerbating matters is the sheer amount of mental gymnastics Mr. Johnson had to perform in order to make this message work. This is a world in which worker droids are commonplace. I don’t think it’s unfair to assume anyone rich enough to own a successful resort could afford top-of-the-line droids to fulfill all menial and janitorial services. Slaves, on the other hand, would need food, water, clothes, living quarters, and other basic necessities to perform their duties. Furthermore, the only slaves shown to the audience are children, who would be a less-than-ideal choice to perform feats of manual labor. Droids wouldn’t need anything other than the occasional maintenance check, and they are much stronger than human children, allowing them to be far more efficient. As presented to the audience, Canto Bight’s business plan is a nightmare from both a logical and a logistical standpoint – and an unnecessary, self-imposed one at that. There is no sane reason why these rich war profiteers would need to resort to using human slaves. Obviously, they were written that way to establish them as evil with a capital “E”, but a diegetic reason either doesn’t exist or is so weak, it shatters the suspension of disbelief.

Freeing the animals and having them rampage through town wouldn’t be a meaningful setback to those profiting off the war, either. In fact, all Finn and Rose likely accomplished was putting the entry-level workers, who had nothing to do with these unethical businesspeople aside from receiving paychecks from them, in peril. Even worse, wouldn’t messing up the casino just result in more hard work for the slaves? It’s not as though Finn and Rose made an effort free them, instead settling for letting loose a few captive animals to go on a brief rampage that would realistically result in the deaths of several innocent bystanders.

There is also an elephant in the room regarding this message. Specifically, it is greatly undermined by the company that owned the Star Wars franchise at the time: Disney. Throughout the 2010s, Disney was determined to dominate the entertainment industry. This was punctuated by their then-recent acquisition of 20th Century Fox, but they would also constantly use their acquired proprieties to prevent them from entering the public domain. Their ruthless business tactics and copyright policies ensured they had little in the way of meaningful competition by the second half of the decade. Consequently, a product bearing their name espousing such a strong anti-capitalist sentiment would be like a rich mob boss with hundreds of political connections earnestly telling people that crime doesn’t pay. It makes me wonder how those who praised the film for this message reconciled the cognitive dissonance.

Of course, no critique of this film would be complete without addressing the character of Luke Skywalker himself. The Resistance clearly considered him a beacon of hope, for when he had vanished, they went through Hell in an attempt to find him. They did what they could to ensure the First Order never found him, making several sacrifices along the way. Redeeming Darth Vader and playing an instrumental role in taking down the Galactic Empire is now the talk of legends. Even the poster of The Force Awakens acknowledges his importance, as his actor, Mark Hamill, was billed second on most posters despite having no dialogue when Rey found him. Then again, he didn’t really need dialogue, as the moment spoke for itself. For those who had been following the series, it really was a powerful moment.

Rey hands Luke the lightsaber he inherited from Anakin. Seconds later, Mr. Johnson renders the scene a complete joke by having Luke toss aside the lightsaber over his shoulder. Anyone expecting Luke to be brought back into the fight and face off against a new wave of fascists is in for a disappointment when he reveals he hid from the rest of the galaxy to die. As the last Jedi, he believes the order should come to an end, citing how their complacency when they were in power caused the Sith to rise and rule the Galaxy for decades. Even after defeating the Empire, he was powerless to prevent the First Order from finishing what their predecessor started.

It is nearly impossible to overstate how out of character Luke acts in this film. Gone is the idealistic young man redeemed Darth Vader of all people and in his stead is a cynical curmudgeon who tells Rey to leave him alone. To play the devil’s advocate for a moment, I don’t think this was a bad idea in of itself. Characters – especially ones as dynamic as Luke Skywalker – absolutely can change over time. However, the point of an arc is that we get to see the character evolve in response to significant life events. As it stands, while the idea for an arc is there, we, the audience, only truly see the two endpoints – the first rooted in Return of the Jedi and the second coincides with his appearance in The Last Jedi. By not properly demonstrating a logical progression, Mr. Johnson essentially created an original character who also happened to be named Luke Skywalker.

To be fair, there are a few flashbacks that shed light on what caused him to radically change his viewpoints. Unfortunately, what is revealed to us succeeds at doing nothing but shooting more holes in the narrative’s credibility. Luke had trained Kylo – Ben Solo as he was once known – before he fell to the dark side. He claims that he entered the hut to confront Ben before the latter went rogue and collapsed the structure. Kylo himself manages to catch wind of this and, using a psychic connection between him and Rey, tells her ha different story. Luke had attempted to murder Kylo in his sleep. When Rey confronts him about this, Luke admits the true story. He had sensed a profound darkness in Kylo and, against his better judgement, considered killing Ben. His student then saw him standing over him with his lightsaber drawn, causing him to fall to the dark side.

The purpose of this plot point is fairly obvious. A running theme throughout this narrative involves the demystification of legends. Luke Skywalker isn’t presented as an all-powerful, all-knowing sage, but rather a flawed human being like everyone else. The problem, I find, is that this revelation casts Mr. Johnson’s interpretation of the character in a very negative light – more so than the director likely intended. Even if he regretted his action immediately, Luke pushed Ben to the dark side, indirectly causing countless deaths at the hands of Kylo Ren.

Considering that, against all odds, he stuck to his idealism and redeemed his father Darth Vader, allowing him to die as Anakin, being quick to run Kylo Ren – his nephew – through with the lightsaber makes no sense at all. On top of that, he didn’t even try to make up for his error in judgement by joining the Resistance, causing the First Order to carry out their campaign largely unopposed. This is especially tenuous when you consider that Leia has far fewer qualms fighting off the First Order despite losing her son to them or even after the trauma she suffered over thirty years prior when her home planet, Alderaan, was destroyed by the Death Star. Meanwhile, all it took was one comparatively minor setback for Luke to throw in the towel completely.

For that matter, the whole idea of bringing the Jedi to an end is equally nonsensical. Again, what Mr. Johnson attempted to do was clear. In a series that saw the worlds in shades of black and white, he wanted to introduce moral ambiguity to the proceedings. It’s not a bad idea, but the problem is that the antagonists are doing objectively horrible things. The Jedi may have had their flaws, but you could count on them not to causally blow up planets or oppress entire populations. In fact, they were trying to prevent that kind of suffering from happening. To equate them with the Sith, the Galactic Empire, or the First Order is ludicrous. It comes across as the kind of development you would see in terrible works of fanfiction penned by self-proclaimed super-fans of Darth Vader and the Empire. This is incredibly jarring when you consider Kylo Ren was intended to be a critique on that exact kind of fan.

I don’t think the comparison is unfair either; I guarantee if you’ve read such pieces, you will espy a few of the bad storytelling trends within the narrative of The Last Jedi. It’s especially apparent in the way Mr. Johnson paints Kylo Ren in such a sympathetic light while downplaying the atrocities committed by him and the First Order. Just the fact that he would downplay the actions of a fictional faction whose ethos and crimes against sapient beings were heavily inspired by those of Nazi Germany – to the point of calling their foot soldiers Stormtroopers – carries with it a truly incalculable number of unfortunate implications.

Mr. Johnson even ended up implementing the stereotypical fanfiction trope wherein the author attempts to place the protagonist and antagonist in a relationship – regardless of how many mental hoops one needs to jump through to get there. At one point, Snoke establishes a Force link between Kylo and Rey. From there Rey begins uncharacteristically displaying feelings for Kylo. They’re not quite romantic, but she does suddenly care a lot about him for some reason – which is exacerbated by giving the dark lord an out-of-place shirtless scene. With the way she tells him to put on a shirt, you would never guess they tried to kill each other a few days ago.

I will say that there is nothing untoward about the protagonist sympathizing with their archenemy, but one must establish the correct context in order for it to work. As it is, Rey’s attempts to bring Kylo back to the light side only make sense when we project ourselves onto her – not when we go by what she herself has witnessed. With Princess Leia and Han Solo being one of the most beloved fictional couples of all time, of course plenty of people would want to see their son become good. Diegetically, however, Rey’s own investment in Kylo’s plight makes no sense.

The Last Jedi takes place immediately after The Force Awakens. To even reach Luke, Rey had to fight tooth and nail against Kylo and his forces. While the mission was a success, Han lost his life attempting to redeem his son. While I can believe that Rey would attempt to reach out to him after hearing of how important he was to Leia and Han, killing his own father should tell her Kylo is not at all interested in being redeemed. Despite this, and having no personal reason to do so, she ends up being more insistent on reaching out to him than even Leia. In other words, Rey goes from being a focused warrior to exhibiting behavioral patterns disturbingly similar to hybristophilia.

When The Last Jedi was released, critics had nothing but praise for it, believing it to be very progressive for its multiracial, inclusive cast. If that was what Mr. Johnson tried to do, this single piece of characterization prevented him from realizing his goal. The idea of girls falling for bad boys is one that had existed long before the debut of Star Wars – James Dean’s performance in Rebel Without a Cause being the classic example of this trope in action. As mentioned before, it was practically a staple of fanfiction with authors – stereotypically women – romanticizing attractive, male villains.

However, in the 2010s, the philosophy was picked up by self-proclaimed “Nice Guys”. Although they called themselves “Nice Guys”, a thorough evaluation of their psychological profile – or talking with them for more than two minutes – revealed they were anything but. These were the kinds of people with thoroughly repugnant personalities and no self-awareness whatsoever. This caused them to lash out at the world for not providing them a woman, believing they overlook nice guys in favor of bad boys, which, in turn, complemented the adage that nice guys finish last. Needless to say, it was an idea deeply rooted in misogyny – the classic belief that women cannot make logical decisions, being slaves to their hormonal urges.

While Mr. Johnson doesn’t go as far as making Rey kiss Kylo, these story beats are uncomfortably similar to the narrative those “Nice Guys” spun. I’m sure it wasn’t his intent, but it is impossible to ignore how chauvinistic his characterization of Rey manages to be. If this was intended to be a character flaw for Rey, why choose one based on such outdated views regarding gender? It especially doesn’t help his case that he expressed interest in the pairing in certain interviews, suggesting the romantic subtext may have been intentional.

This sudden, mutual interest does wind up benefiting Rey – albeit at the expense of the plot’s integrity. Through the link Snoke established, Kylo brings Rey to him. Snoke reveals that he established the link to defeat Luke. Rey attempts to go for the killing blow and put the conflict to an end, but she is quickly overpowered. Snoke then orders Kylo to kill Rey. Continuing the plot’s propensity to throw curveballs, Kylo bisects Snoke with his lightsaber, killing the Supreme Leader. This development was cheered by critics, who believed it to have been one of the single greatest twists of its day. It’s easy to see why it was admired. Because of how similar The Force Awakens was to A New Hope, people naturally assumed Snoke would be the main villain. For the second film to kill him off halfway through the plot blindsided even the savviest viewer.

I myself found myself enjoying this twist – or at least until I took a few minutes to think about the underlying implications. Snoke was established as a person with powers to rival Emperor Palpatine. Setting aside the plot discrepancy of where Snoke was in the original trilogy, the biggest problem with how his character is handled is that it actively hinders any kind of meaningful storytelling. Obviously, Snoke would have to be a powerful Force user to not only establish the First Order, but also corrupt Kylo, yet he gets killed off as though he were a novice. Arrogance is a flaw commonly associated with villains, but his death makes one wonder how he managed to suppress any attempts at usurping his position when Kylo managed it without breaking a sweat. I do like that Mr. Johnson didn’t make him a second Palpatine. He never would never have fallen for such a tactic so easily, having placed Darth Vader in an inefficient life-support suit to ensure he could never overthrow him. Still, there were far more interesting routes to go with Snoke’s character than killing him off unceremoniously.

Kylo then fights off the Praetorian Guard with Rey’s help. Rey urges Kylo to abandon the dark side, but the latter instead offers to rule the galaxy with him. This is a twisted version of how Return of the Jedi ended wherein Darth Vader redeemed himself by turning on his master, thus saving not only the galaxy, but also his son. Here, Kylo killing Snoke doesn’t start him on the path towards redemption – on the contrary. He now wants to kill off the past by eradicating both the Jedi and the Sith to prevent the cycle from beginning anew. Rey refuses, fighting Kylo for control over Luke’s lightsaber. Unfortunately, the weapon is broken in half in the fight. Undeterred, Rey renders Kylo unconscious and escapes the flagship. Upon regrouping with the rest of the First Order, Kylo declares himself the new Supreme Leader.

While I think this was an interesting setup, the actual execution leaves a lot to be desired. The main problem with Kylo Ren as the new main antagonist is that he utterly lacks the sheer intimidation factor his grandfather had. Granted, his inability to live up to Darth Vader’s image is a central part of his character, but it doesn’t change that his success is invariably in spite of himself. It’s easy to assume Darth Vader made such an effective villain because he was extremely powerful and capable of effortlessly defeating countless Rebels. While that certainly established him as a credible threat, what really made you realize the gravity of the protagonists’ situation was when you realized he’s the emperor’s second-in-command in a hierarchy enforced by power. It told viewers that as bad as Darth Vader was, his master outclassed him.

With The Last Jedi, Snoke is set up in a similar fashion – to the point of defeating Rey easily much like how Palpatine brushed aside Luke. He is then killed off by Kylo, which would logically place the latter as the new main antagonist. This proposition doesn’t work in practice when you examine Kylo’s track record against Rey. The first time they fought, Rey managed to defeat Kylo despite the former lacking experience and the latter having been taught by Luke Skywalker himself. Similarly, their clash in The Last Jedi results in Rey successfully escaping Kylo. When this film concludes, the narrative wants a man who has lost to Rey twice to be taken seriously. Sure, anyone else who goes up against him is practically doomed and he did kill two major characters, but the protagonist – the natural choice to take down the main antagonist – has already handily defeated him twice.

Detractors loved to point out that Rey was overpowered because of this, but I personally assert that those criticisms were untenable. Even by the end of The Last Jedi, Rey really hadn’t done anything that, by this series’ standards, would’ve been considered especially outlandish. Luke himself had managed to pull off many of the same things in A New Hope. If anything, Rey’s profession goes much further in explaining how she is able to fight and commandeer aircraft than Luke’s agricultural background. The Force Awakens also justifies her victory over Kylo Ren well enough because Chewbacca had severely wounded him with a blaster beforehand – and even then, she only barely defeated him.

The real problem with her character concerns how poorly her arc is handled. In the original trilogy, Luke starts off as a fresh newcomer with mysterious powers that allow him to trounce the entry-level Stormtroopers and destroy the Death Star. In The Empire Strikes Back, he is given a brutal wakeup call in the form of a resounding defeat at the hands of Darth Vader only to rise from the ashes in Return of the Jedi. If Mr. Abrams intended to have Rey’s arc progress similarly, The Last Jedi throws a spanner in that proposition. By the end of this film, the Resistance may be in a horrible position, but Rey herself has suffered no lasting setbacks other than losing to Snoke. While Star Wars always had an idealistic tone to the point where the Rebellion’s victory was more of a question of how – rather than if – it would happen, the original trilogy’s narrative still had suspense to spare going into Return of the Jedi as a result of Luke’s defeat and Han’s freezing. When The Last Jedi concludes, Rey is still largely undefeated with Snoke’s victory over her being comically short-lived. This leaves the audience with practically no suspense at all. They’re just waiting for Rey to land the blow that will end the First Order once and for all going into the third film.

Finally, it’s worth noting that The Last Jedi utterly fails to stick the landing. It’s certainly not the worst way I’ve seen a film end, but every weakness exhibited in the narrative thus far comes back for an encore performance. After Holdo’s sacrifice, the remaining Resistance members regroup on Planet Crait. Along the way, Finn had to face off against his former superior, Captain Phasma, a second time. That she survived the previous film is surprising given Han’s suggestion to toss her in the trash compactor. What is equally unsurprising is that Finn easily defeats her. Once again, Mr. Johnson’s inability to give his characters a challenge ensures the path between points in their arcs is a straight line.

The final battle itself is representative of the film’s greatest sin. That is to say, it looks amazing, but falls apart the minute you begin thinking about it. In other words, it’s a case wherein style triumphs over substance. Crait is a planet made of salt, and Resistance ships take advantage of this by scooping it up, thus creating natural smokescreens. However, these tactics prove ineffective when the First Order’s siege cannon arrives to break open the Resistance’s fortress. Finn, refusing to run away anymore, decides to sacrifice his life to save his friends. He nears his destination, but at the last minute, Rose swoops in and crashes into Finn, saving the both of them. She then tells them that they will win the war protecting what they love rather than fighting what they hate. This is considered by many detractors to be the single worst moment in the film. Rose’s speech after saving Finn is something that wouldn’t feel out of place among the poorly written lines of the prequel trilogy. The line itself, while well-meaning, makes no sense given that Finn was trying to what he loves by sacrificing his life.

The scene itself is also edited very poorly. Finn had to have Poe create a diversion while he got close enough to the cannon to destroy it. Despite having a significant lead, Rose somehow caught up to and collided with him to save his life. While this happened, the First Order’s forces apparently just stood there and watched. Once both ships are out of commission, they immediately resume their onslaught, leading to a piece of unintentional comedy when you see explosions in the background immediately after Rose gives her speech. She claims the war will be won by saving what they love while what they love is being torn asunder by the First Order’s siege cannon – an outcome she was arguably responsible for.

These actions cemented Rose Tico as one of the most divisive characters in the franchise. So severe was the backlash against her character that some felt she managed to be worse than the infamous Jar Jar Binks. I will admit she certainly didn’t help the film. Her lines often consist of cheap platitudes that barely have anything to do with the plot. However, I also have to say that the character got far more hate than she deserved. Sure, she’s not a well-written character, but she’s merely par for the course. If anything, returning characters Luke and Leia are more poorly written than she is. One could reasonably argue she has the worst-written dialogue overall, but I would attribute the poor reception to her character to having debuted in this film, thus being sabotaged from the beginning. When a character is introduced in a bad installment of a long-running franchise, there’s usually nowhere to go but down. If nothing else, she at least recognized that Holdo’s leadership was lacking and participated in Poe’s mutiny. It doesn’t explain her skewed priorities on Canto Bight, but again, I blame that more on the bad writing than anything else.

Shortly thereafter, Rey arrives in the Millennium Falcon with Chewbacca. However, even their timely entrance isn’t enough. Fortunately, Luke appears to confront the First Order alone. Kylo, seeing his former mentor orders his fleet to fire upon him, but the Jedi emerges no worse for wear. Kylo then confronts him personally and after trading a few lightsaber blows, runs Luke through. It then turns out Kylo was fighting a Force projection. This allows the Resistance to escape, but Luke, exhausted from the strain, collapses and dies, thus becoming one with the Force.

I do like the fight between Kylo and Luke because it’s an interesting callback to the iconic duel between Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader in A New Hope, but the problem, once again, is that the moment isn’t earned. When one makes the decision to kill off a character as famous as Luke Skywalker, they must take great care to give them a proper sendoff. As it is, the scene’s tone is all over the place. After the initial salvo, Luke nonchalantly brushes his shoulders off, keeping in line with the film’s propensity to crack jokes at the absolute worst moments. Followed up by the revelation that he is projecting himself from afar, it makes his final interactions with Leia come across as retroactively hollow. Plus, he ends up dying anyway, negating the purpose of projecting himself in the first place.

The film then ends with the Resistance leaving the planet. It’s surreal watching these sequences because everyone is in such high spirits despite the Resistance being far worse off than the Rebellion ever was. Indeed, while many people in 2017 praised it for being such a dark take on the franchise, the narrative sabotages its own goal at every corner. It features the First Order at their most powerful, yet its top members come across as incompetent stooges. It tries to demystify the Jedi and the past, yet constantly casts the current main antagonist in a sympathetic light. It warns us of the dangers of unchecked, unregulated capitalism despite coming from a company that was one of the greatest beneficiaries of such a system. It attempts to provide a dark deconstruction of the series, yet it can’t stop cracking jokes. It tries to shock audiences at every turn, yet it ends up being a disorienting mess when you reflect on said twists.

I understand and even sympathize with Mr. Johnson because plenty of people were expecting The Last Jedi to be a second The Empire Strikes Back. However, braving uncharted territory requires a greater level of focus than The Last Jedi ever displays. What The Last Jedi wants to do and how it goes about achieving its goals are so at odds with each other, watching it is akin to listening to ten different people tell entirely different interpretations of the same story at the exact same time. At some point, you just give up trying to make sense of it because you know you’re not going to get a straight answer if you ask them to clarify.

My relationship with The Last Jedi is admittedly complicated. I saw it for the first time during its opening weekend, and I walked out of the theater mostly satisfied with what I saw. Immediately thereafter, I ended up seeing Guillermo del Toro’s The Shape of Water, and ultimately deemed it a superior effort to The Last Jedi, having an auteur touch free of the blatant commercialism plaguing the latter. Regardless, I was sure that The Last Jedi was good – if not quite up to the standards of The Force Awakens.

My stance on the film took a turn when I heard a friend express displeasure with the film. Once I did, I sought out video reviews that criticized the film, and was convinced The Last Jedi was an epic disaster. However, in the end, I realized that the vitriolic video reviews proliferating on YouTube at the time were almost uniformly created by bad-faith actors who were, at best, ignorant of what makes a good film and, at worst, actively pushing a backwards-looking political agenda. Once I made this realization, I found myself reverting to my original stance – The Last Jedi is fine, but it is assuredly not the power move proponents believe it to be.

“But wait!” you may cry out. “If you’re okay with The Last Jedi, why were you so critical of it in your review?” The answer to that question lies in the power of hindsight. When reviewing media, I tend to avoid looking too far into the future because my goal is to review art within the context of its release. Admittedly, my actual conclusions can’t help but be in hindsight because, as the adage goes, you cannot unring the bell. Some media can be impressive from a technical or cultural standpoint, yet fail to stand the test of time; it’s just how things go.

In order to enjoy The Last Jedi now, you would have a major obstacle to overcome in the form of its immediate successor, The Rise of Skywalker. The ninth episode and finale to the Skywalker saga effectively undoes and undercuts most of what The Last Jedi did. If The Last Jedi drew you in, you get to watch everything you liked about it mercilessly run through a thresher when watching The Rise of Skywalker. While I stand by my criticisms of The Last Jedi, I do yield that a solid finale that followed up on what it laid out could have made the daring decisions pay off. But that’s not what happened, and the disappointing finale retroactively magnifies the weaker aspects of The Last Jedi. In the end, the subversive tendency of The Last Jedi is virtually indistinguishable from the fan-baiting nature of The Force Awakens and The Rise of Skywalker, for they both speak to the directionless nature of the sequel trilogy as a whole.

Retroactive Score: 3/10

24 thoughts on “Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi (Rian Johnson, 2017)

  1. Read every word, and wholeheartedly agree with every single point, especially with the ‘two endpoints’ referenced in Luke’s arc between ROTJ and TLJ. My main issue with this trilogy has been that by far the most interesting part of the story is the one that isn’t on screen. If we were present during this incredible turn-of-events resulting in Luke pushing Han and Leia’s son to the dark side, we could have accepted it, but this story is of such scope that it’s difficult to digest through simple exposition.

    I’m also in complete agreement with everything you said about Luke’s final standoff. It’s a great moment… until the force projection reveal. The fact that Luke isn’t even there just left me disappointed. If he was going to die anyway, why not have him there and avoid the audience believing his last moment was kinda ‘cowardly’?

    But well, at least TLJ looks great 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yup, it’s the same reason I ended up disliking how Joel was written in The Last of Us. When you have a character change so drastically, it has much more of an impact if we see every step of the progression; you can’t just use a time skip as an excuse to not develop your characters. It also falls into the Far Cry 4 trap in that, as you say, the background elements are far more interesting than the story we’re actually presented. For someone who used Three Outlaw Samurai as an inspiration for this film, he sure didn’t grasp the idea of showing rather than telling.

      And I think the Force projection sequence was just an excuse to pull the rug out from under the audience twice in one sequence. He doesn’t die, but then he does. If they intended to kill him off, it would’ve been far more impactful if he was physically present.

      All in all, I think The Last Jedi is the Avatar of the 2010s – incredible to look at, yet it completely falls apart the exact second you begin using your brain.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Interesting good ideas but completely unearned is a great way to describe the last Jedi. Subversion of expectations here seems to mean we’re not going to do any of the writing work to get there. Its shock value and let’s be edgy with nothing to back it up.

    The Luke/Ben attempted murder scene is the perfect example and even if you don’t really care why Luke thought about it and shrug your shoulders and say we’ll he’s changed a lot in 40 years for goodness sake Ben/Kylo could have used the character development. What was his relationship with Luke before that moment? Anything about the Knights of Ren at all??? Great wrap-up! Looking forward to your thoughts on the last movie!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well, Mr. Johnson was technically successful; I think most people were expecting it to be good – he certainly subverted their expectations. But yeah, the shocking moments are clearly there to make up for a lack of substance; when you’re finished reeling back, you will realize you’ve been had.

      And not expanding upon Luke and Ben’s relationship was a total missed opportunity. It just feels like we’re supposed to take for granted that it’s another Obi Wan and Anakin situation, but relationships don’t go sour in the exact same fashion; it would’ve been interesting to see what, exactly, Luke meant when he sensed darkness in Ben rather make the audience take for granted that it existed.

      I’m glad you liked my review! Honestly, this is one of those bad films that you could write about for more than 10,000 words and still miss several glaring problems, so thanks for pointing that out.


  3. Hm, I don’t know – some fair points but I’m definitely one of the few that actually enjoyed the Last Jedi and the unexpected choices and creative risks taken (although you could definitely remove the casino planet sojourn). Great overview though and it’ll be interesting to hear your thoughts on Episode IX as it seems that generally, viewers/fans who didn’t like TLJ were quite receptive to it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I give Mr. Johnson some degree of credit for taking risks with the franchise. After The Force Awakens outlined itself after A New Hope, The Last Jedi taking risks was, in many ways, necessary for the franchise to stay relevant. Nonetheless, I have to assert that risks can backfire, and I can’t think of a single risk Mr. Johnson took that didn’t, in some way, backfire whether it was the numerous plot holes he created or his exceptionally poor handling of various characters’ arcs. At least we can agree that Canto Bight was a waste of time, huh?

      I just saw Episode IX, and I will say right now it wasn’t quite the disaster The Last Jedi was, but it had its own problems. Like The Force Awakens, it was in a position in which it needed to regain the goodwill lost by a previous installment, though it wasn’t as successful. It really says something that after the sequel trilogy ran its course, some have looked upon the prequel trilogy more fondly.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Oh totally, I think even the most passionate of TLJ defenders agree that the Canto Bight section wasn’t necessary.

        It’s going to be interesting to see where the franchise goes after Episode IX as it definitely needs to be something fresh but recognisably ‘Star Wars’ but right now I’m curious about the Disney+ series that are in the works.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I didn’t hate TLJ and am perhaps not as critical as a casual viewer, as opposed to many fiercely devoted Star Wars fans out there. But as much as I admire Rian Johnson as a filmmaker and for his bold choices on SW, I do dislike the way that he handled the character arcs, especially Luke, Poe, and Rose’s.

    It is a letdown that Rise of Skywalker didn’t do any better. Several plot twists came out of left field (especially *spoilers* with Rey and General Hux), and the conclusion for Kylo Ren was also poorly written. Honestly, it didn’t feel like JJ Abrams had a plan set in stone at all, given that he did discuss with Johnson on TLJ prior to its making.

    All that said, they are still brilliant filmmakers with their own merits and one misstep. Also, this was a really enjoyable read. It’s always great to see varied opinions that are well justified. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • I wrote this review from the perspective of someone who has always admired the Star Wars trilogy, but not quite to the point of being a diehard fan. My knowledge of the series is limited to the numbered episodes, Rogue One, and a few video games. Either way, I think it says something that even people who otherwise like the film are torn on how Luke, Poe, and Rose were handled.

      Honestly, having just seen The Rise of Skywalker, I feel some sympathy for J. J. Abrams and company. They were basically put in a position in which they had almost no good options – mostly thanks to Mr. Johnson’s interference, but also due to something that was nobody’s fault (Carrie Fisher’s tragic, untimely passing). I agree that many of the plot twists came out of left field, and I think the film was extremely rushed, which ensured these developments had no time to settle. However, that’s also because half of the film’s runtime was spent trying to backpedal from The Last Jedi, succeeding maybe 10% of the time. I can believe the trilogy was started without a master plan, but whatever Mr. Abrams intended, Mr. Johnson made it unnecessarily difficult for the trilogy to gel as a cohesive whole. It really should be a case study as to what happens when the left and right hands aren’t agreeing with each other. And if Mr. Abrams didn’t actually have a plan, then I feel my point still stands because the sequel trilogy as a whole really demonstrates how badly you can blow it when you don’t have answers to the mysteries you set up.

      Even if he is a capable director, I do think Mr. Johnson is the kind of creator who puts the cool factor before anything else. The result is that while he can come up with some great ideas, he rarely follows them to their logical conclusion. As you just read, it could be seen throughout The Last Jedi, but I noticed that was the case with Looper as well; it especially doesn’t help his case that he has a character point-blank tell the protagonist (and by extention, the audience) not to think too hard about his film’s premise. It’s not entirely unfair given the high-concept nature of Looper, but seldom is it a good sign when a creator’s preemptive defense against a criticism is to tell them not to think about it. I find he’s one of those creators who can do wonders when someone is around to give him guidance; it’s when he’s left to his own devices that he tends to go off the deep end.

      Same applies to Mr. Abrams. He is great at setting up mysteries, but absolutely abysmal at providing answers to them. Because of his propensity to be as vague as possible, it was kind of inevitable in perfect 20/20 hindsight that this trilogy would eventually be painted into a corner.


  5. I do give it points for jumping off of the dreck that was the Force Awakens and actually doing something different, but then it loses plenty for being dumb as hell. The film is an absolute mess. It feels like nothing it tries to do really lands in the way its intended. All the characters are weak and poorly written, and frankly, the actors playing them don’t have the charisma, or are at least not demonstrating it, that made some of the worse writing in the original trilogy into charming moments. I agree that Rose doesn’t deserve all that hate, as she was a horrible character, sure, but most of the rest or just on par with her. The handling of the series canon, particularly when it comes to Luke, retroactively cheapens the OG plotline. And Rey is just the worst. It’s not just that she’s Mary Sue-esque, she’s barely a character here. She’s more of a walking plot device. For the lead character, other characters are in the focus for basically everything she does. She’s just there, doing things, for other characters to react around, to explore facets of other characters, or to make things happen for others. She doesn’t have a strong motivation or reasoning of her own, you don’t see plot points connecting and leading to more plot points through her, and you don’t get the same sense that she’s thinking, considering, and plotting that you do with most characters in most every medium. Things just happen with her, with no internal build up, no leading into it, no foreshadowing, and oftentimes no seeming reason, for the sake of doing something with some other character.

    And on top of it, Mark Hamill just seemed to be phoning it in, Carrie Fischer didn’t seem able to act out everything they were asking of her, the most interesting part was the subplot that went nowhere, and Kylo Ren’s character is completely unable to carry the whole tortured conflicted super-evil but maybe not thing they’re trying to push through him. This film is garbo.

    Liked by 1 person

    • There is definitely something to be said for wanting to go off the rails and try something new. However, The Last Jedi was very much a risk in the same way Metroid: Other M was a risk, which is to say that while Mr. Johnson deserves points for daringness, he loses every single one of them and then some when it comes to the actual execution of his ideas. You’re right; this film is an absolute mess from top to bottom. There are some individual moments of great writing, but it’s clear that Mr. Johnson didn’t really think through his implications for a majority of the drafting process. I could tell he was very much thinking in terms of shocking his audience rather than actually telling a good story.

      With The Last Jedi, I think we’re back to the prequel trilogy in terms of writing quality. But, in a lot of ways, The Last Jedi was worse because the damage the prequel trilogy inflicted was highly localized. This installment goes even further than The Force Awakens when it comes to cheapening the events of the original trilogy. Sure, one could argue the prequels made Darth Vader difficult to take seriously, but they were also easy enough to ignore; you could see them if you wanted to or ignore them because the original trilogy was cohesive enough that one could easily tell what is going on at a given moment.

      As for the acting performances, you’re also right. I had always wondered why when people are compiling the list of the greatest actors/actresses of all time that cinephiles tend to favor older ones, and I think seeing The Last Jedi after the original trilogy demonstrates exactly why that is – a distinct lack of charisma. The likes of Hux, Holdo, and Rose don’t hold a candle to their predecessors. I still think Daisy Ridley as Rey is highly charming, but I can’t ignore that her character was handled very poorly in this film. She barely has any purpose at all other than being a walking, talking plot device to bail the other characters out of a jam. I’m still not sure if I’d declare her a Mary Sue, but there is no getting around that the director’s unwillingness to challenge her is a serious problem with her character. In the end, she is basically doing things because the plot demands she does, and as you say, her story beats don’t have any natural through lines. It really is some of the laziest storytelling I’ve ever seen in a critically acclaimed film.

      Rose was a badly written character, but she didn’t deserve that level of hate because her bad lines were par for the course. I would even go as far as arguing Luke was the single worst-written character in the entire film. People tend to give him more of a pass not because of the writing, but because he had a lot of goodwill going into The Last Jedi. But yeah, Mark Hamill wasn’t really giving this his all. He seems positively bored half the time, which could be explained by him being confused at Mr. Johnson’s direction. If so, I get it because this was nothing more than a desecration of a perfectly fine character – another aspect that brings to mind bad fanfiction. And while it wasn’t as egregious as Luke’s characterization, Leia was also handled poorly. She had an interesting status as Kylo’s moral center and the film went nowhere with it. Kylo himself also doesn’t come across as sympathetic as the narrative makes him out to be, and his characterization is just bizarre. Again, it just feels like he’s doing things because the plot demands it rather than for any internal reason. Conclusion: this film is indeed garbo.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I whole-heatedly agree with every point you mentioned in your review. I don’t believe Rian Johnson is a bad director or even go to the lengths of saying he “ruined” Star Wars, he just simply shouldn’t have helmed the middle section of a set trilogy which is supposed to flesh out the narrative and characters rather than deconstruct them. I applaud him for having a vision and sticking to it, though I could use that as a backhand compliment as I say the same thing about George Lucas with the prequel trilogy. I still really enjoyed the movie, though I will not bother to defend whether it’s a good Star Wars movie or not. When I first saw TLJ in the theater I spent the next several days trying to figure out my feelings of the movie. There are specific sequences that I really enjoyed in the movie, mostly how visually impressive they are(the opening battle, throne room fight, or the Crait sequence), but there’s also moments that I found….less than stellar.

    My biggest annoyance with the film was not that Rian set out to subvert expectations it was that so much of the movie was devoted to it. You think we’re gonna turn left? Nope, we’re gonna go right! You think we’re gonna go right? But in the end the zig-zag-zig manuever went nowhere and unltimate felt disappointing i.e. Canto Bight.

    I actually found Luke’s transformation an interesting contrast to that of Obi-Wan, whereas the latter lived in isolation on Tattooine to protect the child of his greatest failure(Anakin), but Luke let his failure destroy him and he retreats to Ach-to. This may be just appealing to my inner cynic, so I don’t argue with anyone that points out how out of character we find Luke in TLJ.

    Another point I found interesting but didn’t really notice until you mentioned it is the stance of Poe vs. Holdo within the movie. You stated how it simply reinforces the idea of “shut up and listen to authority”, how much of the Poe/Holdo stuff could be viewed as an allusion to enthusiastic fans(Poe) who should just defer to the director/filmakers(Holdo) and blindly trust their judgement BECAUSE they are the ones in charge?

    Okay, getting too over-zealous talking about Star Wars….another great review!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Glad you liked the review!

      I do think that Rian Johnson is a capable director, though even in his good films, he strikes me as a “style over substance” guy. Regardless, he was an exceptionally poor choice to helm this film given that his strategy was to go off the rails in the dumbest ways possible. As it stands, both the eighth and ninth episodes fail to build off of the seventh. There is something to be said for having an artistic vision and sticking to it despite everything. However, a bad film is a bad film – it doesn’t matter what the intentions were. As an olive branch, I will say I greatly enjoyed the film when I saw it, but once I began hearing the detractors out, it was clear they were making better arguments at every possible juncture. The supporters generally couldn’t do much better than “you’re wrong” or “stop taking it so seriously”. It does have good individual moments and it is stunning from a visual standpoint, but that means nothing given how shoddy the story is.

      And the film’s propensity to subvert expectations quickly became obnoxious given that it cheapened the storytelling in the long term. At some point, one has to accept that going the subversive route isn’t always the best option.

      I will say that not making Luke Obi-Wan 2.0 was a fine creative decision, but I stand by my assertion that he is the worst-written character in the entire film. Had we been shown the progression outside of a scant few flashbacks, it could’ve worked, but that’s not what happened.

      Taking gender dynamics out of the equation, I can see the interactions with Holdo and Poe appealing to the current wave of critics because a lot of them come across as very, very authoritarian. You, a lower-ranked individual, simply cannot challenge their opinions or sacred cows in any way, or they will give a 4,000-word dissertation explaining to you exactly why you’re wrong and you should be ashamed of yourself. There is something to be said for having conviction in one’s opinions, but they take that notion to some rather dogmatic extremes, though if anything, I would argue it’s a cover for a distinct lack of conviction given that they feel they have to go on the offensive every time things don’t go their way. If they had any confidence in their own opinions, they wouldn’t feel the need to cut dissenters off at the heels.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Almost the same way I’ve read reviews of the Breaking Bad episode “Fly”, not-so-coincidentally directed by Rian Johnson, praising it for its subversion but I hated the episode at the time and felt it didn’t progress the characters or plot in any way. Too be fair the other two episodes he directed were great, but ever since The Last Jedi that has been pointed out routinely.

        Another name I immediately think of when using the tag “style over substance” would have to be Zack Snyder….😬

        Liked by 1 person

        • I did hear that the Rian Johnson-directed Breaking Bad episodes were pretty highly acclaimed. I haven’t watched the show myself yet, but I do have to wonder if he’s one of those directors who just kind of bumbled his way into brilliance. I say that because between the three films I’ve seen of his, it always feels like his best ideas come across as happy accidents whereas his more subversive ideas critics praise him for are, more often than not, disasters in some capacity. It’s to the point where I think Knives Out happens to be his best film thus far less because it’s a masterpiece and more because it was the film that just so happened to accent his strengths while downplaying his weaknesses to the point that they were tolerable. For that matter, I find it a bit strange the idea of an episode of a series with strong continuity being singled out as the greatest episode of a show ever written; it seems like it would just be a great chapter of a great series. It’s too early to call, but I do have to say that if he, somewhere down the line, ends up with the same reputation as M. Night Shyamalan, I wouldn’t be surprised. Also, just an aside, but the guy really needs to stay off of social media.

          I don’t think I’ve really seen much of Zack Snyder’s work, but secondhand accounts suggest that is indeed the case.

          Liked by 1 person

  7. I am more convinced then ever I have no desire to watch any Star Wars beyond the original three films. Which I loved. Unfortunately my attention span just isn’t what it used to be.

    Great review though! I’m sorry it didn’t work for you. I hope the next film is better.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Don’t. If you have any reservations at all, I can tell you the sequel trilogy is not worth the investment. It’s a shame because it got off to a reasonably good start, but the following two films dropped the ball in some of the worst ways I’ve ever seen a big-name franchise do. To address your attention span issue, I suggest a viewing of Seven Samurai or another classic epic posthaste.

      Glad you liked the review, though.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. I thoroughly loved your review. I’d say my biggest issues with The Last Jedi were the Holdo confrontation with Poe and the strange structure of the film. It felt like there was a double climax or something like that. One during the Snoke throne room fight and one down on Crait.

    Liked by 1 person

    • As I said, this is one of those films you could write a 10,000-word dissertation about and still miss several glaring problems. I forewent mentioning the point you brought up because I felt it would be more substantive to make a case that The Last Jedi ultimately fails at its intended goals – trying to be progressive and inclusive when it, in practice, it comes across as equal parts chauvinistic and authoritarian. Nonetheless, you’re right in that a major problem with the film is that it seems to have multiple final acts. This is one of those films that doesn’t really ends as much as it runs out of energy and dies after a several periods of hyperactivity. And Holdo is probably one of the worst-written sympathetic authority figures I’ve seen in fiction – or at least from any fictional work this acclaimed. Again, The Last Jedi is what happens when you don’t think through your implications; the results can be scary, no?

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Pingback: January 2020 in Summary: Oscar Detour | Extra Life

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.